Pages

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Film, Television and Music Licensing

Licensing Music to Film and Television
Author: Kedrick "Rick" Mahoney, MBA
Market Research Overview
            In the past five years, market trends such as music piracy and the rise in digital downloading has caused the music business to alter it processes in order to maintain leverage in the industry. One opportunity that is beginning to receive more attention is music licensing for film and television. This process has now grown to include music licensing for the Internet. The key to successfully implement strategies for licensing music is to ensure that one functions in one way or another as songwriter for musical projects. By doing so, songwriting credits and support from performing rights organizations such as BMI, ASCAP and SESAC will assist an entity with their music licensing efforts. Technology has also begun to capitalize on the music-licensing sector. Peoples (2012) stated the following in Billboard magazine:
The arrival of OpenEMI's first commercial app is a sign of licensing progress. Blue Note Records' iPad app, created with developer Goldbug, is free to download and gives the user unlimited streaming for $2 per month. It was downloaded 30,000 times in its first five days of release, Blue Note president Don Was said during his FutureSound keynote interview. The market for more services like Blue Note's iPad app clearly exists. The necessary hardware already has a high adoption rate. In the last four quarters alone, Apple has sold 125 million iPhones and 58.2 million iPads, and its iTunes store has generated more than $7.5 billion in revenue worldwide, much of that from sales of iPhone and iPad apps. Consumers are spending money. If rights-holders inhibit innovation in the music industry, they will spend it elsewhere. (p. 22-23).
Spotify is another online based organization that has used technology to tap into the music licensing market. “Spotify’s valuation outstrips companies with 18 times its annual revenue” (Peoples, 2012). Currently, the main leaders of the music-licensing trend consist of cover song remix artist’s, social media sites such as YouTube, and performing rights organizations (PROs).
            YouTube. YouTube has started to take advantage of this process. According to Mlot of PC Magazine, YouTube announced a new deal being sealed with music publishers in June of 2012. The deal includes top music firm BMG Rights Management among several others. “The deal, announced on the YouTube blog, will more thoroughly compensate producers and artists for the use of their music in user-generated work on the video-sharing site, YouTube said” (Mlot, 2014). The value of this system is that any musician or artist has the opportunity to have their music published to accompany ads and commercials designed for Internet, film and television. This will in turn bring additional income to musicians and recording artists aiding in the constant production of new music.
            Remix Artists. The number of remix artists using cover songs and samples is also trending in the world of licensing. Anyone interested in legally sampling or covering a previously published music must be certain to obtain a mechanical license for that particular work. “One DJ learned about this distinction the hard way when he made an entire album of Beatles remix and was sued by the Beatles’ record label, EMI” (Vrana, 2011, p. 813). This process is set forth to control the illegal use musical martial that has been copyrighted. It also ensures proper payment for the use of published musical works.
            Performing Rights Organizations. Performing rights organizations, also known as PROs, function to monitor how published musical works are used and pays out royalties to songwriters and publishing companies. They work hand in hand with the efforts of music supervisors, who seek out the right musicals for use in film, television or commercial. These two sources are a great benefit to the lives of career songwriters and musicians seeking to license the use of their musical works. “Licensing music to the TV and film industry is a lucrative business that employs a great many people, but to the outsider the industry seems daunting and complex” (Knapp, 2007, p. 50). Nevertheless, the collaboration of efforts allows films and other on-screen productions to be brought to life with the use of music created from the hearts and minds of songwriters.
Buyer Persona
            In an effort to identify the specific buyer persona for YouTube’s music licensing process, the Rick Johnson music project will be the point of reference. Rick Johnson is songwriter affiliated with the ASCAP performing rights organization. He has been performing as a singer-songwriter for the past twenty years which an educational background that encompasses music, vocal performance and business. Rick is in his early thirties and resides in Atlanta, Georgia, which has taken on the name the Music Mecca of the South with a fast-growing film industry. After following the proper music project release specifications which including song production, protection, manufacturing and marketing, Rick was able to have several of the songs from his Documentary EP release successfully licensed for Internet soundtrack use during the last two quarters of 2013. During the beginning of 2014, Rick was able to see the benefits of his music use and licensing efforts on his ASCAP Publisher Domestic Distribution royalty statement under the Southern Bay Records brand. At your leisure, review the Appendix section for a view of the Southern Bay Records royalty statement. According to the 2012 Edition of the Music Salary Guide, musicians and singer-songwriters can realize an average songwriting income of around $40,000 per year, but can see profits per license as high as the low $100,000 range depending on the commercial use of the song. Therefore, Rick must maintain a sense of uniqueness and creativity with his songwriting in order to maintain a competitive edge in the industry. His lifestyle consists of consistent music engagements, networking events, music rehearsals, live performances and musical project collaborations.
Positioning Statement
            Overall, proper education on music licensing is beneficial to struggling singer-songwriters and musicians because it offers ground level learning on an often-overlooked aspect of the music industry. Unlike many other outlets for aspiring singer-songwriters, the Internet and advancements in technology have created vast levels of opportunity for unknown career-minded music professionals to make a comfortable living. Through effective collaboration with the music licensing leaders mentioned earlier, one’s career can go from beginner to advanced levels in record time. In addition to offering this opportunity, these music leaders also have discussion boards; video trainings and step-by-step processes that make it easy to get started with music licensing. The training tools and ease of access is the primary factor that currently differentiates competitors in the field of music licensing. It appears that user-friendly sites with easier access are reaping the benefits as can be seen with companies such as YouTube. Their service is entirely Internet based with automated calculating of analytics requiring little to no work from music makers. Nevertheless, in the world that we live in, information can be gained from so many different sources. At the end of the day, it’s not about how much knowledge you gain; it's what you do with it that makes a difference.


References
Knapp, L. (2007). Licensing Music To The Film And Television Industries. Canadian Musician, 29(5), 49-56. Academic Search Complete.
Mlot, S. (2012). YouTube Inks Licensing Deal With Music Publishers. PC Magazine, 1. Academic Search Complete.
Music Salary Guide. (2012). Music Careers in Dollars and Cents. 2012 Edition. [e-book] Berklee College of Music. Available through: The Career Development Center http://www.berklee.edu/pdf/pdf/studentlife/Music_Salary_Guide.pdf
Peoples, G. (2012). Licensing: Slow, Steady Progress. Billboard, 124(43), 22-23. Academic Search Complete.
Vrana, R. M. (2011). The Remix Artist's Catch-22: A Proposal for Compulsory Licensing for Transformative, Sampling-Based Music. Washington & Lee Law Review, 68(2), 811-862. Academic Search Complete.


Appendix


No comments:

Post a Comment